Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
There is actually a need to point out that the courts have opted to maintain the ban on corporations extending donations to political campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision by the Supreme Court will certainly not be welcome for all. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. This is what has brought about the checking of the role of corporations in matters to do with politics. It was barely uncommon for these corporates to donate to political campaigns every now and then right then. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. You will learn that this case was brought to court by two companies from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. It is imperative to mention that these companies indicated that the first amendment rights of companies was not being considered. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This goes ahead to show that the treatment offered right here tend to be discriminatory. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
It is imperative to mention that what the high court ruled was still favored. This ruling indicated that corporates are not given the room to contribute to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.